Who is suing you · LVNV Funding, LLC

LVNV is the name on the lawsuit. Another company runs the case.

LVNV Funding, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company that buys charged-off consumer debt and sues on it. Its own court filings name its parent as Sherman Originator, LLC. Resurgent Capital Services manages the accounts and files the cases in LVNV’s name. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recorded in 2018 that LVNV has no employees and makes no collection decisions.

Dorrian v. LVNV Funding (Mass. 2018) · LVNV Funding LLC v. Finch (Md. 2019) · LVNV’s corporate disclosure, August 2026 · Updated August 2026

All seven debt buyers, and what applies to every one of them

The chain your debt traveled

  1. Credit One Bank
  2. MHC Receivables
  3. FNBM, LLC
  4. Sherman Originator III
  5. Sherman Originator
  6. LVNV Funding, LLC

Inside one family

The New Jersey Supreme Court traced this chain in 2026 and called the transfers intercorporate. A Credit One card, a $618.91 default, five sales, then a lawsuit. LVNV’s own court filings name Sherman Originator, LLC as its parent today. Maryland’s regulator recorded Sherman Financial Group above LVNV, in findings a court published in 2019. The OCC, which examines Credit One Bank, wrote in a 2025 evaluation that Credit One’s parent company is affiliated with Sherman Financial Group through common beneficial ownership. The card, the charge-off, the sale and the lawsuit can all happen inside one corporate family.

Diana v. LVNV Funding (N.J. 2026) · LVNV Funding LLC v. Finch (Md. 2019) · LVNV’s corporate disclosure, August 2026 · OCC evaluation of Credit One Bank, 2025

The government record

2011
Maryland’s Commissioner of Financial Regulation ordered LVNV to stop collecting and suspended the collection agency license it had obtained the year before. The Commissioner found that LVNV had been collecting in Maryland unlicensed since 2005, and that “tens of thousands” of its District Court affidavit actions “knowingly contained false, deceptive, or deficient complaints and supporting affidavits.”courtlistener.com
2012
LVNV settled the Maryland action on June 28, 2012 without acknowledging any wrongdoing. It agreed to pay a penalty of one million dollars, to dismiss with prejudice every collection case it had filed in a Maryland court before that date, and to credit consumers for prejudgment interest and attorneys’ fees.courtlistener.com
2021
Connecticut’s Department of Banking entered a consent order against Resurgent Capital Services, LVNV’s servicer, with a $2,500 civil penalty for collecting interest in violation of state law. An AI summary circulating online puts $100,000 on this order. That penalty belonged to unrelated parties in the same bulletin.portal.ct.gov
Today
No CFPB or FTC enforcement action exists against LVNV, Resurgent, or Sherman. We searched both federal databases with control searches that return results for other debt buyers, so we checked this rather than assumed it. Both of LVNV’s larger rivals have federal consent orders on their records. LVNV has none. Consumer complaint counts are not enforcement, so this page prints none in their place.consumerfinance.gov

How much they sue

Brian Parker · 30+ years defending these cases

How these cases come apart.

The real operation behind LVNV is Resurgent Capital Services, LP. Resurgent manages the debt, hires the law firms, provides the Affiants who sign the sworn statements, and controls the entire collection process.

Brian Parker · LVNV cheat sheet

They almost never have signed, individual assignments of your specific debt... That broken chain of title is your primary attack vector.

Brian Parker · chain of title guide

What he looks for in a LVNV Funding file

  • There is no LVNV witness. The affiant works for Resurgent and swears to records they did not make.
  • Five and six entity chains where the only identification of your account is an electronic filename.
  • Same-day double sales, where one seller conveys the same file to two buyers on the same date.
  • Sworn affidavits with no date, and fill-in-the-blank forms that leave out the original creditor.

The opinions linked on this page come from the same public database Case Searcher runs over, with the full text attached.

Watch · August 2026

This Is How He WON After LVNV Funding Sued Him TWICE!

Brian reads through one member’s account of two LVNV cases heard together.

I Took LVNV To Trial And Won, Here’s How

October 2025

Who Is LVNV Funding, LLC?

July 2023

From the open forum

Members who stood where you stand.

  • the judge ruled in my favor and ordered LVNV to pay for my District Court filing fees!

    A member’s account of two LVNV cases heard together in Circuit Court, after he lost in District Court. They sued him for under $2,000 in total.

    Read the thread

  • came back in and just asked for a non-suit

    A member’s account of a hearing he brought certified-mail receipts to. He is describing what LVNV’s stand-in attorney did next, and he says himself that a non-suit does not end it.

    Read the thread

Every thread is public and free to read. These are the members’ own accounts of their own cases, and we make no claim about how any of them came out. Read the whole forum.

What people ask

Questions about LVNV Funding.

If the account is years old, the timing questions are on the old debt page. If you have already been served, start here instead.

We have no number for that, and neither does any page ranking for the question. LVNV files at volume: Massachusetts counted 31,545 of its cases in 2025. Pew found that under 4% of people sued over a debt have legal representation. Members here describe both, an attorney arguing the case and an attorney asking to drop it. Read the threads rather than trust a number nobody has.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court wrote in 2018 that LVNV has no employees and does not contact the people whose debt it owns. Maryland’s highest court read a different record in 2019 and said the evidence did not bear that claim out, describing a board of managers that directed LVNV’s collection activity. Both are the record, so we print both.

LVNV is the plaintiff, so the case says LVNV owns it. LVNV’s own website says it outsources the management of its portfolio of accounts to Resurgent Capital Services. The Massachusetts court recorded the split in 2018: LVNV takes no part in the decision to sue, and Resurgent holds sole discretion to hire the law firms that file. The two companies also file different parents in court. LVNV names Sherman Originator, LLC, in a disclosure filed in August 2026. Resurgent names Alegis Group, LLC and Resurgent Holdings, LLC, in a disclosure signed in April 2026. For your case that is a proof question. The plaintiff still has to show the account moved to it from the bank you borrowed from.

Nothing we can find says so. The claim traces to one sentence in Wikipedia’s article on Sherman Financial Group. That sentence cites a Forbes article published on December 15, 2025, and the Forbes article says only that Resurgent “was once owned by Sherman Financial Group”. It gives no date, names no buyer, and describes no sale. December 2025 is the day Forbes published, and a Wikipedia editor turned it into the date of a divestiture on January 15, 2026. Some AI answers now repeat it. Both companies kept filing the same parents in court right through that window, from December 2025 to August 2026: LVNV names Sherman Originator, LLC, and Resurgent names Alegis Group, LLC and Resurgent Holdings, LLC. What we genuinely do not know is whether Sherman Financial Group still sits at the top of either one. Those filings name parent corporations, Sherman Financial Group is a private company, and nobody’s filings answer the question either way.

Whatever it bought. The one pattern anybody has measured is Credit One Bank: January Advisors reports that the Virginia Poverty Law Center found evidence that over half of LVNV’s cases were for Credit One debt. The link between those companies is on the record with a federal regulator. The OCC, which examines Credit One Bank, wrote in a 2025 evaluation that Credit One’s parent company is affiliated with Sherman Financial Group through common beneficial ownership. Common beneficial ownership means the same owners sit behind both companies. It does not mean one company owns the other. Affiliated through common beneficial ownership is the OCC’s phrase, not ours. Your own paperwork names the bank. Read the complaint and the bill of sale before you accept anybody’s summary, ours included.

It can be. Plenty of people first hear of a debt buyer when a process server hands them papers. Check the papers against the court rather than against us. The case number on the front page is on your court’s own docket, and the clerk can confirm that a case exists. Nothing on this site can tell you whether yours is genuine. If it is, the deadline printed on it is already running.

No, in the sense people mean when they ask it. LVNV is a real Delaware company, it really files lawsuits, and a judgment it wins is a real judgment that can reach wages and bank accounts. Whether it can prove it owns your particular account is a separate question, and that one belongs to the court.

We do not know. The initials are widely read that way and we found no source for it, so we will not repeat it as fact. Maryland’s regulator recorded LVNV as headquartered in Las Vegas and apparently managed from South Carolina, and its servicer works out of Greenville, South Carolina.

We do not negotiate for anybody, and we publish no settlement percentage for LVNV because we have no sourced figure for one. The library teaches an order. Negotiate in writing rather than by phone. Say in every message that you are not acknowledging the debt. File your answer on the day it is due whether or not a deal has landed, because a phone call does not stop the clock.

Before you file anything

About the motion to compel arbitration.

Reddit’s most repeated advice in an LVNV case is a motion to compel arbitration, and people there report collectors dropping cases rather than pay the fee. Brian takes the other side: “Arbitration is not your first move. Arbitration is your last resort.” Those posts are real and we are not calling them made up. A defense attorney of thirty years still treats the motion as the last thing to reach for, because it moves your case out of court and moving it back is hard. A motion to compel also needs the arbitration clause from the agreement you signed, so the first question is whether the plaintiff has produced that agreement at all.

The full answer, and the video, are on the hub

Sued by LVNV? The clock started when they handed you the papers.

Start with what to do after being served. Then let ParkerGPT read what they filed against you. Both plans include every tool on this site except Court Tester, which is Pro only.