Court Tester · In KillDebt Pro
Lose here first.
Court Tester is a simulated hearing built from your actual filings: an AI judge, opposing counsel who argues back, and a co-counsel whispering strategy only you can see. Argue your motion until you can win it, before the day it counts.
- Built from your filings
- Your court, your judge
- It ends with a ruling
The hearing
It runs like the real one, because it runs on your case.
A real oral-argument sequence: the judge opens, both sides argue and rebut, and the judge rules. Scroll, and it plays.
The Court
We are here on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Counsel, you filed the motion; I will hear from you first.
Plaintiff’s counsel
Your Honor, the account records attached as Exhibit B establish the balance, and our affidavit authenticates them. There is no genuine dispute of material fact…
Co-counsel · only you see this
• Their affiant is Acme’s employee, not the original creditor’s. Ask how she has personal knowledge of records Acme did not create.
• They did not address the missing bill of sale. Do not let the balance argument distract from ownership.
You
Your Honor, the affidavit cannot authenticate records Acme never created. Their own exhibits show the account changed hands twice, and the record contains no document for the first transfer…
The Court · ruling
The Court finds a genuine dispute of material fact as to ownership of the account. The motion for summary judgment is denied…
The judge runs a real hearing
A fixed oral-argument sequence, your state’s law, and no ruling until both sides have been heard.
Opposing counsel fights back
An AI litigator arguing the other side of your actual motion, from your actual documents. It does not go easy on you.
The whisper only you see
Private co-counsel reacts to what just happened: the opening they left, the trap you are walking into, the case to cite. The judge never sees it. Neither does the other side.
It ends with a ruling
The judge decides, and tells you why. Losing here is the point: every loss is one you did not take in the real room.
The co-counsel
It hands you ammunition. It never writes your lines.
After each exchange, your co-counsel tells you what mattered: the weakness in what opposing counsel just said, the point you are about to concede, the authority to cite. Short bullets, only when they help.
What it will not do is speak for you. You formulate the argument, in your own words, because that is what you will have to do in the real room. Practice that does the work for you is not practice.
Opening
Their counsel just conceded the assignment date is disputed. That is your genuine issue of material fact; say so now.
Warning
Careful: if you agree you “had a card with the bank,” you concede more than you need to. The account they sued on is what matters.
Authority
Your state’s business-records rule requires a witness with knowledge of the record-keeping. Ask where theirs is.
Built from your case
Upload the filings. It builds the courtroom.
Your documents
The real papers, both sides
Upload the motion, the response, the exhibits. Every party in the room has read all of it before anyone speaks.
Your courtroom
Your state, your court, your judge
The simulation argues your state’s law in your named court. Add your judge’s name and opposing counsel’s, and it addresses them as the real docket would.
Your motion
The hearing you actually face
Summary judgment, motion to dismiss, or motion to compel, from either side of the v. Collection suits, credit card suits, foreclosure.
The practice loop
Run it again. And again.
One member lost to the same motion ten times in Court Tester, adjusted every run, and won the eleventh. That is the product working. Pause a hearing mid-argument, come back tomorrow, run a new scenario against the same filings.
Every hearing exports as a transcript, in the same format a court reporter would hand you, so you can study what worked away from the room.
Transcript · Session 11
ORAL ARGUMENT: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Acme Portfolio Holdings, LLC v. Maria R.
- - -
THE COURT: …the motion for summary judgment is denied.
Sessions 1–10: motion granted. Session 11: denied.
From the forum
“Court Tester is worth it” is a thread title, not our headline.
Members started that thread themselves. These are public posts, quoted with typing errors corrected and nothing else changed.
After 10 tries I finally, in Court Tester, beat Bank of America on standing. You have to play with it and learn. It is worth the price.
I have two lawsuits from BofA and one from LVNV. The cost of Court Tester is minuscule compared to what it does for you going into a hearing. I run daily scenarios based on motions and answers.
If you get near court dates I highly recommend Court Tester, because nothing prepares you for trial better.
A simulated ruling is practice, not a prediction. Results in real court vary, and nothing on this page is a promise about yours.
Works with
- ParkerGPTIt drafts the motions you argue here, for whatever stage your case is in.
- Cheat SheetsThe one or two printed pages you carry into the hearing you rehearsed.
- CommunityMembers started the thread called “Court Tester is worth it”. It is public to read.
- All nine toolsThe whole platform on one page, grouped by the job each tool does.
The first time should not be the real time.
Court Tester is in KillDebt Pro, with everything else the platform does. Argue it tonight; argue it for real when you have already heard their best.