Skip to main content

Community · feature request

Use the Counter Affidavit

brian ·

Just dropped a new video an hour ago on an oldie but goodie: Creating the Counter Affidavit. This is a must on any defense case. Once you have done the work (ParkerGPT does that for you), the Counter Affidavit is a blue print for your whole case and something to rely upon in any court setting or when you need a motion response. Check it out. And please, go check out Court Tester. Lose in Private to Win in Public.

Keep swinging for the fences,

Brian Parker

9 replies

  • dbenton ·

    Are we to submit our signed documents, or is it okay to load the unsigned from Artifacts inside Killdebt?

  • brian ·

    Not sure what you are asking. Thank you.

  • dbenton ·

    I forged ahead and got the answer to my question. Court Tester is great!!!

  • RubenBaeza ·

    I had court today. Capital one merged with Discover. The filed October 25, 2025 online, but I got the packet in the mail from Suttel and Hammper in February 9,2026. I filed a motion to quash last week on Aprll 13th, and also paid to have the law firm served.

    However, the judge said because I served the motion to quash late, she would not accept it. I told her I wanted to do a counter affidavit. She gave me 20 days from todays date to respond. What shoud i do? This loan has already been securitzed off my social security numer. I am the creditor not the debtor.

  • UrealeyesICU ·

    Ruben, I hear you, but you have to play by their rules to beat them in their courts. Use the lack of standing issue with their securitization documents. ParkerGPT has those documents for you to use. If you go into court talking about your SSN, they will just abuse you as a "sovereign citizen". I hope it makes sense for you. Operate from wisdom.

  • Splash ·

    Just FYI for people in CA, CA courts do not require debt collectors to do an Affidavit, so we won't do this. This is not legal advice, and verify for yourself.

  • Frank ·

    Stick to the law and the facts. Going into court arguing "red herrings" and related "sovereign citizen" type issues, will only work against you. If you are going to challenge "who funded the loan" argument, you need to get the other side to admit through discovery, that "your" signature is what created the value in the transaction. But, this is an advanced argument ONLY meant for those thoroughly familiar with the actual mechanics of banking and loan origination. And you had better have a CPA expert witness to give testimony as to how and why banks create money out of thin air, Not meant for the novice litigator.

  • Splash ·

    Have you done this? I would love to know more about it. The bankers admit it themselves in publication
    "Modern Money Mechanics".

  • bubbayates444 ·

    Heck yesterday judge didnt even read mine got a crap show of fraud with pra wished you would look at this case to help strengthen the chat A.i.

Already a member? Log in to join this discussion.

You can read every thread. Members can answer.

The people posting here are using the same tools you would be, on cases like this one.