Community

Stuck!

StayStrong101 · June 12, 2026

Currently my answer is suppressed after LVNV counsel filed a motion to suppress my answer 3 days before trial which was set for 5/21/26. Originally that was supposed to be decided on the papers for 6/8/26 but the day before trial it was changed to be heard on the same day of trial (5/21/26). LVNV hired a lawyer to be present and mentioned the motion and the judge decided to hear the motion that day and we never had trial. He granted the motion to suppress because he said my objections to their discovery were not procedurally correct even though everything I’ve ever filed was on time. He then ignored the fact that the plaintiff asked for an extension of 90 days to cure their discovery and continued to question when I served them discovery and told me I never served them even though plaintiff filed written notice acknowledging they received discovery from the same date I said I served discovery. He also previously denied my motion to compel and dismissal when plaintiff never showed. He also told me I was lucky I got my default judgement vacated. On separate hearings. But anyway, he granted my answer be suppressed and then told me to answer their interrogatories but never gave me a deadline for when they had to be submitted by. I also told the judge I feel like this is very prejudicial and he said he wishes it didn’t have to be and to answer the interrogatories and it won’t be. Fast forward to yesterday 6/11/26 I answer interrogatories and serve them certified return mail receipt and checked my email today to see that yesterday plaintiffs counsel filed proof of service for suppression. Not sure what that means and what steps to take as ParkerGPT keeps giving me information that doesn’t pertain to my case or other issues. I am in NJ. Also not sure if it’s important plaintiffs counsel keeps sending mail to an address they say is their last known but it was corrected on record and the corrected address is where I send all of my mail from.

9 replies

  • brian · June 15, 2026

    You have to finite your prompts or your answers will be just as muddled. The narrative above is too much and probably presents a challenge to ParkerGPT beyond human or machine capability. Break it down into smaller pieces and resulting answers will be better.

  • StayStrong101 · June 16, 2026

    I have broken it into pieces and started new chats and I’ve had to correct ParkerGPT multiple times. I am not sure what to do at this point.

  • JM75_208 · June 18, 2026

    Did you try the cheat sheet?

  • StayStrong101 · June 19, 2026

    no but I will thank you!

  • JM75_208 · June 20, 2026

    You can also use parkergpt to ask questions about what's important and what isn't in your case if you have any questions. Try using the rocket! It definitely helps!

  • StayStrong101 · June 20, 2026

    thank you! I ended up answering the interrogatories and making a motion to vacate the suppression order after listening to the audio recordings of 2 important hearings. The judge contradicted himself in both and ignored the facts. So hopefully it gets granted and I can have a fair trial.

  • brian · June 22, 2026

    Love my cheat sheets. Keep your legal blinders on and stick to a message and theme. Create one and keep repeating it. Your honor, as Plaintiff's documents clearly show, the DEBT COLLECTOR (don't refer to them as anything esle) has not met its burden of proof and has no standing to sue me is one theme I use.

  • Splash · July 2, 2026

    Our state has certain civil codes you can use to disqualify judges if you can prove they acted unfairly. People I know have used them with success.

  • brian · July 6, 2026

    Don't wade into that area. Stick to your case and defense. I always assume an appeal will be needed to I make my record on the record. The Judge with get it. I will say, "Just so the record is clear, Your honor....." All you want is fairness.

Already a member? Log in to join this discussion.

You can read every thread. Members can answer.

The people posting here are using the same tools you would be, on cases like this one.