2/2/26 I defended against Capital One at Magistrate court. Plaintiff attorney showed up with paper showing the court date and maybe 8 pages of Discover card statements. I had my evidence of the 3 different times I had demanded validation, chain of title, merger docs all certified mail. Capital One had never validated the debt and went on the sue anyway.
I made that point clear. Also made the point case was not about if I had ever had the credit card account. Case was about standing and if Capone had the legal right to collect. Plaintiff attorney stated that Capone's name in the caption on the lawsuit and a few previous statements proved with a preponderance of evidence the debt was valid and collectible.
I reiterated the FDCPA violation and the requirement of chain of title to prove Capone was indeed the real party in interest. I could tell this was the first time the judge had ever dealt with a Defendant that actually put on a defense. Judge's belief is that if Capone did actually merge with Discover and they have old Discover statements they have more than proven their burden.
Magistrate has 5 days to rule. Let's see if he actually gets into the law to find out what validation truly is and the need for proof in the chain of title.