Community

Initial Capital One Discover bank lawsuit

RuleOfLaw · February 3, 2026

2/2/26 I defended against Capital One at Magistrate court. Plaintiff attorney showed up with paper showing the court date and maybe 8 pages of Discover card statements. I had my evidence of the 3 different times I had demanded validation, chain of title, merger docs all certified mail. Capital One had never validated the debt and went on the sue anyway.

I made that point clear. Also made the point case was not about if I had ever had the credit card account. Case was about standing and if Capone had the legal right to collect. Plaintiff attorney stated that Capone's name in the caption on the lawsuit and a few previous statements proved with a preponderance of evidence the debt was valid and collectible.

I reiterated the FDCPA violation and the requirement of chain of title to prove Capone was indeed the real party in interest. I could tell this was the first time the judge had ever dealt with a Defendant that actually put on a defense. Judge's belief is that if Capone did actually merge with Discover and they have old Discover statements they have more than proven their burden.

Magistrate has 5 days to rule. Let's see if he actually gets into the law to find out what validation truly is and the need for proof in the chain of title.

8 replies

  • brian · February 3, 2026

    If it helps, see the last video I just did on Cap One/Discover and the new stuff to use against them if it fits for you.

  • RuleOfLaw · February 7, 2026

    Case updated 2/3/26 Default Judgment for the Defendant. I have not yet seen any type of order. Only saw was updated on the court docket. Thank you Brian Parker.

  • Sasha · February 12, 2026

    "I reiterated the FDCPA violation and the requirement of chain of title to prove Capone was indeed the real party in interest." can you share notes or what/how you argued/supported this. I have counter court date in March and am nervous and would like to be prepaid.

    Thank you

  • brian · February 13, 2026

    Check out ParkerGPT's cheat sheet tab for one point of action. ParkerGPT has everything in there for a response.

  • Pro_sayer · February 13, 2026

    So in the recent 10-Q of Capital One Financial Corporation in note 2 capital one describes things like: “Intangible assets: The intangible assets identified in the Transaction include purchased credit card relationships, the Discover Network, brand/trade names, network and financial partner relationships and a core deposit intangible. All intangible assets were valued using an income approach under which future cash flows for each intangible asset were forecasted, tax-effected and then discounted using an appropriately risk-adjusted discount rate. A description of each intangible asset, along with the key inputs used in its valuation, is provided below:

    •Purchased credit card relationships: represent the value of future activity from existing credit card relationships over their expected lives. The fair value was estimated utilizing the multi-period excess earnings method, a type of the income approach. The key inputs into the valuation included projected future finance charge and fee income using assumptions of cardholder activity, relevant operating costs for managing these relationships, attrition based on cardholder account retention levels, contributory asset charges reflective of the other assets of the business that are required to generate these cash flows, a discount rate determined based on the estimated cost of equity, risk-free return rate and risk premium for the market and the specific risk profile of the intangible asset relative to the other assets acquired and the overall business, and the tax rate reflective of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates.”

  • brian · February 17, 2026

    Wow and Awesome, great news. Can you share your paperwork (in word if possible) and their stuff including the complaint and the ruling so I can do a video for everyone on this? Thank you.

  • TonyDee · February 25, 2026

    How was there a default judgment if it sounds like a Hearing was held? Strange - the court clerk probably messed that up. You may want to call to get that corrected.

  • Eileen · March 1, 2026

    I just had my hearing for motion to dismiss same lawsuit (Cap One/Discover). No matter what I said the judge said everything looked in order regarding the complaint. Motion to Dismiss was denied. On to the next steps.

Already a member? Log in to join this discussion.

You can read every thread. Members can answer.

The people posting here are using the same tools you would be, on cases like this one.