My motion to Dismiss is on Thursday and I have a couple questions that I am unsure of and having a hard time to understand. I am hoping that someone might have an answer as it is something that I am going to raise in my case and I feel logically it makes sense, but I am wondering more of what the law says about it. Hoping maybe someone with more legal mind or Brian could possibly respond to this question.
Capital One has attached the Right-to-cure that was sent (to an address I didn't live at the time and did not receive) however, that is not the question as I am already going to go after that direction.
My question is about Right-to-Cure they are using Discover Bank Right to Cure but if Capital One is the sole and surviving Entity wouldn't they need to file their own Right to cure notice before filing suit?
I mean either way they are going to be trapped they are going to admit that they inherited all of Discovers things including their violations or they are going to admit that they did not send notice and violated the state statute.