KillDebt.com
Logged-in Image
CLICK ME!
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Plaintiff Attorney systematic process to unethically cure defective complaint once answer is filed-

Community Self Defense Q&ACategory: General CommentsPlaintiff Attorney systematic process to unethically cure defective complaint once answer is filed-
Scott Welker-Reyes asked 1 day ago

I could be wrong, but it seems too coincidental. I had two complaints filed against me, both creditors using the same law firm. The firm in each case filed defective complaints, which I think they do as a matter of practice assuming that the bulk of Defendants are going to be hit with a defauly judgement. However, in both of these instances, once I filed a Motion to Dismiss concurrent with my answer, within about a week a large envelope arrived in my mailbox. In it, a letter from the lawfirm (completely different office than entered in the case in a completely different state) saying they had received my request for verification of the debt....odd since I never sent one, right? LOL and a copy of all of the billing statements for the account. This was sent regular mail, not filed in the case. The firm is trying to create a record outside of the case in order to save thier defective initial complaint it seems using unauthorized communication to do it. Happen to anyone else?

1 Answers
Brian Parker Staff answered 1 day ago

The good thing is it is only what is on the record that is of real use. The scenerio you describe is very common with the two cases and often dependant on debt buyer vs creditor.